Does SB 145 fix sex offender registry issues for LGBTQ?

Statue of justice

SB-145 is being touted by Democrats in California as the fix for ending discrimination for LGBTQ sex offenders. What is it and what exactly does it fix?

Dordulian Law Group blog online describes the law like this: “The issue in question concerns how the law views different types of sex crimes involving minors”. “Under existing law, illegal sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age do not automatically require the offender to go onto the sex offender registry if the offense in question involves vaginal intercourse”. “In such instances, a judge must examine the facts of the case and determine whether or not sex offender registration is warranted”.

The problem with that as Dordulian Law Group indicates on their blog is this: “Sexual relations between a teenager age 15 and over and a partner within 10 years of age that involve instances of oral or anal intercourse do require automatic sex offender registration, and a judge has no say over whether or not such registration is warranted”. “Believing that such a distinction “disproportionately targets LGBT young people for mandatory sex offender registration since LGBT people usually cannot engage in vaginal intercourse,” State Senator Scott Wiener introduced SB 145.”

DLG outlines the goal of SB-145 as: “The goal of SB 145, according to the bill’s language, is to “exempt from mandatory registration under the act a person convicted of certain offenses involving minors if the person is not more than 10 years older than the minor and if that offense is the only one requiring the person to register”. “But rather than amend existing law to include vaginal intercourse with a minor as an act that requires mandatory sex offender registration — which would in effect remedy what Senator Wiener apparently views as discrimination — the bill aims to make all criminal sex acts with a minor over 14 equal by providing offenders with an opportunity to evade said mandatory registration”. “Doing so would be a disservice to survivors of those sex offenders, to communities, and to law enforcement officials.”

Problems with SB-145 if passed by  Gov. Gavin Newsom are discussed by DLG: “Survivors whose attackers manage to receive light sentences not befitting their crimes would be forced to accept that those convicted attackers could also evade the former mandatory punishment rightfully designating them as sex offenders depending on a judge’s decision”. “Communities would be forced to accept that sex offenders could now potentially live anonymously among law-abiding citizens”. “Law enforcement officials would be forced to accept that their ability to properly monitor sex offenders could potentially be compromised”. “All of these scenarios are unacceptable and highly concerning”. “Moreover, given that another bill Senator Wiener authored has already passed — SB 384, which we discussed in a previous blog post — such unfortunate scenarios are entirely unnecessary”. 

“SB 384 changes the current lifelong registry system mandated for all sex offenders to a tier-based system where certain offenders who file a petition and meet specific criteria can be eligible to be removed from the list”. “In other words, if an individual is convicted of a sex crime with a minor, he or she is able to petition to be removed from the sex offender registry after 10 years”. “SB 384 has already passed, and is set to become law on January 1, 2021”. 

Senate Bill 145 passed both houses of the State Legislature late Monday evening and will be sent to Gov. Gavin Newsom. Contact him @

Governor Gavin Newsom
1303 10th Street, Suite 1173
Sacramento, CA 95814

Phone: (916) 445-2841
Fax: (916) 558-3160

Written by Marie

2 thoughts on “Does SB 145 fix sex offender registry issues for LGBTQ?

  1. Can I simply say what a reduction to search out somebody who actually knows what theyre speaking about on the internet. You undoubtedly know easy methods to bring a problem to mild and make it important. Extra people must read this and perceive this side of the story. I cant imagine youre no more common because you positively have the gift.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s