Reuters using name recognition to falsify fact checking on an opinion article. They list no facts to debunk the story. They do this as a matter of limiting media and informing the general public. Reuters job it seems is to debunk any story or opinion article in this case that speaks in a negative nature to Democrats and corruption. Never coming to the opinion that they side in the favor of Republicans or Conservatives. How can the odds be so stacked?
Reuters takes personal attacks on Conservatives on a constant basis. They also attacked and falsely fact checked an article about Soros arrest. When Reuters does this fact checking the results say “Reuters Staff” no one person takes accountability this way. Zero facts are given to back up the claims are false. In fact they riddle the fact checking with quotes like this: “This fabricated article copied segments of a press release from the Department of Justice on the arrest of a former CIA official, not President Obama. Reuters found no credible news reports on the alleged arrest. An event of this kind would have widely been reported in the U.S. and elsewhere”.
Actually if your paying attention to World Events this would NOT be widely reported in the US or anywhere for that matter. And where is this “Credible News Reports” they speak of. CNN is the Fake News Leader for the US. Why would they base the fact checking on it would have been credibly reported elsewhere is not doing any sort of investigation into weather the article is true in nature. This is a hugely misleading representation of what checking the facts actually entails. This is laziest form of investigative journalism is done and why Americans do not believe in the fake factchecking that Facebook and Twitter source out. This is also one of the main reasons that our Government is having CEO’s of Twitter and Facebook testify under oath. Maybe Reuters should have to do the same.
Reuters article debunking Soros involvement in Election tampering has links that they used as their basis for claiming the facts are untrue and these links go to nowhere. The internet cannot find them. Odd? Not really for Reuters, many of their articles have links that go absolutely no where. This is a example of the Reuters Fact Checking they have up currently on their website. Direct quote here with links:
Reuters article debunking Soros involvement in Election tampering has links that they used as their basis for claiming the facts are untrue and these links go to nowhere. The internet cannot find them. Odd? Not really for Reuters, many of their articles have links that go absolutely no where.
This is a example of the Reuters Fact Checking they have up currently on their website. Direct quote here with links: Some of the articles with the false arrest report have been deleted, but their archived versions can still be seen here and archive.vn/QvTZL . Go ahead click a Reuters link it goes no where. This is who people are basing their Fact Checking on. Sad that this is how far Media and the Democrats have come. They believe that Americans are stupid and we will believe them when they say “WE ALREADY CHECKED ON THIS FOR YOU FOLKS” ” NOTHING TRUE HERE”.
Just like our Government wants accountability from Media and Social Media for monitoring what information is given to us and letting us decide we need to insist on being able to have the freedom of getting any and all information and forming our own opinions. We need our Freedom of Speech restored in America to or we need to abandon completely the Websites that removed it in the first place.
Written by Marie